For a Dev8d session I did with Owen Stephens in February I presented data for a single book and followed how it had changed as standards changed, trying above to explain to non-cataloguers why catalogue records look and work the way they do. At least one person found it useful. I am now drafting an internal session at work on the future of cataloguing and am planning to take a similar approach to briefly explain how we got to AARC2 and MARC21, and where we are heading. I took the example I used at Dev8d and hand-crafted some RDA examples, obtained a raw .mrc MARC21 file, and used the RDF from Worldcat to come up with a linked data example.
I have tried to avoid notes on the examples themselves. However, do note the following: the examples only generally use the same simple set of data elements, basically the bits you might find on a basic catalogue card: no subjects, few notes, etc.; the book is quite old so there is no ISBN anyway. The original index card is from our digitised card catalogue. The linked data example was compiled by copying the RDFa from the Worldcat page for the book; this was then put into this RDFa viewer (suggested by Manu Sporny) to extract the raw RDF/Turtle; I manually hacked this further to replace full URIs with prefixes as much as possible in an attempt to make it more readable (I suspect this is where some errors may have crept in). The example itself is of course a conversion from an AARC2/MARC21 record. C.M. Berners-Lee is Tim’s dad.
Feel free to use this and to point out mistakes. I would particularly welcome anyone spotting anything amiss in the RDA and linked data, where I am sure I have mangled the punctuation in both.
Harvard Citation
Berners-Lee, C.M. (ed.) 1965, Models For Decision: a Conference under the Auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council Organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society, English Universities Press, London.
Pre-AACR2 on Index Card
BERNERS-LEE, C.M., [ed.].
Models for decision; a conference under the auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society.
London, 1965.
x, 149p. illus. 22cm.
AACR2 on Index Card
Models for decision : a conference under the auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society / edited by C.M. Berners-Lee. -- London : English Universities Press, 1965.
x, 149 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
Includes bibliographical references.
- Berners-Lee, C. M.
AACR2 in MARC21 (raw .mrc)
00788nam a2200181 a 4500001002700000005001700027008004100044024001500085245021000100260004900310300003200359504004100391650003300432700002300465710003900488710003000527710004900557_UCL01000000000000000477125_20061112120300.0_850710s1965 enka b 000 0 eng _8 _ax280050495_00_aModels for decision :_ba conference under the auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society /_cedited by C.M. Berners-Lee._ _aLondon :_bEnglish Universities Press,_c1965._ _ax, 149 p. :_bill. ;_c23 cm._ _aIncludes bibliographical references._ 0_aDecision making_vCongresses._1 _aBerners-Lee, C. M._2 _aUnited Kingdom Automation Council._2 _aBritish Computer Society._2 _aOperational Research Society (Great Britain)__
AACR2 in MARC21
245 00 $a Models for decision : $b a conference under the auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society / $c edited by C.M. Berners-Lee. 260 __ $a London : $b English Universities Press, $c 1965. 300 __ $a x, 149 p. : $b ill. ; $c 23 cm. 504 __ $a Includes bibliographical references. 700 1_ $a Berners-Lee, C. M.
RDA
Title proper Models for decision
Other title information a conference under the auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society
Statement of responsibility relating to title proper edited by C.M. Berners-Lee
Place of publication London
Publisher’s name The English Universities Press Limited
Date of publication 1965
Copyright date ©1965
Media type unmediated
Carrier type volume
Extent x, 149 pages
Dimensions 23 cm
Content type text
Illustrative content Illustrations
Supplementary content Includes bibliographical references.
Contributor Berners-Lee, C. M.
Relationship designator editor of compilation
RDA in MARC21
245 00 $a Models for decision : $b a conference under the auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society / $c edited by C.M. Berners-Lee. 264 _1 $a London : $b The English Universities Press Limited, $c 1965. 264 _4 $c ©1965 300 __ $a x, 149 pages : $b illustrations ; $c 23 cm. 336 __ $a text $2 rdacontent 337 __ $a unmediated $2 rdamedia 338 __ $a volume $2 rdacarrier 504 __ $a Includes bibliographical references. 700 1_ $a Berners-Lee, C. M., editor of compilation.
Linked data
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> . @prefix worldcat: <http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/> . @prefix library: <http://purl.org/library/> . @prefix viaf: <http://viaf.org/viaf/> . @prefix lc_authorities: <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/> . @prefix mads: <http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#> . worldcat:221944758 rdf:type schema:Book; library:oclcnum "221944758"; schema:name "Models for decision : a conference under the auspices of the United Kingdom Automation Council organised by the British Computer Society and the Operational Research Society"; library:placeOfPublication _:1; schema:publisher _:4 . schema:datePublished "[1965]"; schema:numberOfPages "149"; schema:contributor viaf:149407214; schema:contributor viaf:130073090; schema:contributor viaf:137135158; schema:contributor viaf:36887201; _:1 rdf:type schema:Place; schema:name "London :" . _:4 rdf:type schema:Organization; schema:name "English Universities Press" . viaf:149407214 rdf:type schema:Organization; madsrdf:isIdentifiedByAuthority lc_authorities:n79056431; schema:name "British Computer Society." . viaf:130073090 rdf:type schema:Organization; madsrdf:isIdentifiedByAuthority lc_authorities:n85076053; schema:name "Operational Research Society." . viaf:137135158 rdf:type schema:Organization; madsrdf:isIdentifiedByAuthority lc_authorities:n79063901; schema:name "Institution of Electrical Engineers." . viaf:36887201 rdf:type schema:Person; schema:name "Berners-Lee, C. M." .
This is really useful and interesting, but I’m wondering why you chose to ignore the RDA Vocabularies (http://rdvocab.info)? Given that they are optimized for RDF, and provide a much easier way to show roles of people and organizations, it seems odd to me.
Diane: Thank you. I ignored it for the RDA example as I followed the format of the RDA Toolkit examples and wanted it to be as independent from any implementation as possible.
For the linked data example, which I think is what you meant, I wanted something both real world and easy: Worldcat was one place I found that record living in the wild so I didn’t have to do any hand coding. I like the Worldcat example too because you can see what it looks like in a traditional setting right next to the directly equivalent linked data. I think it’s more convincing for demonstration purposes to have something real. Also, of the actual linked data implementations I’ve had the chance to look at in any depth (Cambridge, BNB, and Worldcat), RDA has been largely absent and ignored to be honest.
There are several potential examples also missing. I might add some of them if I get the chance and I think they will be useful:
– AARC2 in UKMARC
– RDA on a catalogue card
– RDA using the BNB model
– RDA using the CUL COMET model
– RDA using the RDA Vocabularies
They would all need hand-coding.
Thanks for your explanation, I do understand the reasoning. On the other hand, it’s intensely frustrating to me that it’s so difficult to get beyond the ‘real and easy’ stuff to some examples that might really give folks a better understanding of what can be accomplished when we get beyond AACR2 and MARC. And I do know that RDA has been largely absent in the early linked data implementations–some of that is for the reasons you cite, but there may well be other reasons (wish I knew for sure). BTW, we have a proposal in to ALA Publishing to add some examples that use a more ‘native’ RDA approach …